2011年12月30日 星期五

Samsung在澳洲獲判勝訴

Apple與Samaung的手機大戰,延燒全世界,在澳洲也掀起平板電腦大戰,Apple在澳洲控告Samsung的平板電腦Galaxy侵害其專利,要求法院核發禁制令。2011.11.地方法院撤銷禁制令後,Apple即提出上訴。
2011.12.8.雪梨聯邦高等法院認定蘋果所上訴理由並不夠充分,將Apple的上訴案予以駁回。

2011年12月29日 星期四

讚岐烏龍麵商標案定讞

市售的讚岐烏龍麵有兩種:一種是由南僑生產,在各超市、賣場販售的冷藏快煮麵,另一種則是由日商樺島商事開設的「土三寒六」烏龍麵專賣店,專賣的讚岐烏龍麵。南僑於1999年取得商標權。
2007年南憍控告樺島侵害商標權,同時要求樺島必須使用南僑生產的冷凍麵體。樺島則申請智財局撤銷以「讚岐」為名的中、英、日文商標註冊。
2009年智財局裁定,撤銷4件讚岐的中、英、日文商標註冊。南僑不服提起訴願,不過智財法院先後4次判決,都維持智財局的撤銷註冊處分,南僑敗訴確定。

Smart的看法
對於本案,南僑稱政治力介入、政府前後不一,無法保護台灣企業,其實都是對法令的誤解,不論是專利法抑或是商標法,由於都涉及權利人在一段時間的獨占利益,為求慎重,因此,除了由審查委員依法審查外,為考量社會公益,都保有公眾審查的救濟制度,所以,專利法有異議制度,商標法則有評定、異議制度。
由於救濟制度中的審查委員都不是原來的審查委員,當然,有可能做出與前次不一樣的結果,所以,不服的一方還可以提起行政訴訟做為救濟。
本案正是這樣的遊戲規則下的產物,應沒有所謂前後不一、政治力介入...等問題。

2011年12月28日 星期三

iPad在大陸商標權敗訴

一向長於告人的Apple在大陸遭到商標侵權官司,iPad的商標在2000年即被唯冠註冊,雖然財大氣粗的Apple花錢買下iPad全球商標,但卻獨漏大陸這塊大市場,詳見:http://km-ip.blogspot.com/2011/03/ipad.html。
2010年Apple向廣東深圳法院提出訴訟,指控深圳唯冠公司侵害其iPad商標權益,本案深圳法院於2011.12.5.一審判決蘋果敗訴,而深圳唯冠同時也向蘋果經銷商提起訴訟。

2011年12月27日 星期二

智慧局徵求專利審查人員

智慧局為加速清理發明專利待辦案件,將召募專利審查人員170人。

招募條件與待遇
1.國內外大學理工相關科系畢業,並具2年以上相關工作經驗者;或國內外理工相關研究院所畢業得有碩士學位者(待遇約新台幣51,000元)。
2.國內外大學理工相關科系畢業者(待遇約新台幣49,000元)

工作項目
從事相關類科專利申請案之發明專利審查及交辦事項。

有興趣的朋友請上網報名:http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/Vote_VoteFillPage.aspx?VLID=163&path=3345&UNIT=7&CLSID=0

2011年12月26日 星期一

Apple vs. HTC案ITC終判

Apple vs. HTC案ITC終判在拖延數週後,終於在2011.12.19.出爐,判決結果Apple勝訴,4件系爭專利中,僅號裁決HTC侵犯US5,946,647號專利的第1及8項權利項,禁售令從2012.4.19.開始,HTC生產的Android手機含有侵權功能者,皆不得進入美國銷售。

US5,946,647
Title : System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data
Filing Date : 1996.2.1.
Issue Date : 1999.8.31.
Abstract :
A system and method causes a computer to detect and perform actions on structures identified in computer data. The system provides an analyzer server, an application program interface, a user interface and an action processor. The analyzer server receives from an application running concurrently data having recognizable structures, uses a pattern analysis unit, such as a parser or fast string search function, to detect structures in the data, and links relevant actions to the detected structures. The application program interface communicates with the application running concurrently, and transmits relevant information to the user interface. Thus, the user interface can present and enable selection of the detected structures, and upon selection of a detected structure, present the linked candidate actions. Upon selection of an action, the action processor performs the action on the detected structure.

被判侵害的權利項
1. A computer-based system for detecting structures in data and performing actions on detected structures, comprising:
an input device for receiving data;
an output device for presenting the data;
a memory storing information including program routines including
an analyzer server for detecting structures in the data, and for linking actions to the detected structures;
a user interface enabling the selection of a detected structure and a linked action; and
an action processor for performing the selected action linked to the selected structure; and
a processing unit coupled to the input device, the output device, and the memory for controlling the execution of the program routines.
8. The system recited in claim 1, wherein the user interface highlights detected structures.

2011年12月23日 星期五

Pixart vs. Avago雙方和解

IC設計原相(Pixart)與美商安華高(Avago)間的CMOS專利訴訟,於2011.12.5.達成和解,各自撤回訴訟,並再簽訂包含Optical Finger Mouse(OFM)與optical pseudo trackball的專利及技術交互授權合約,根據這項新合約,原相須支付安華高約US00萬元授權金,分1年時間付清。

訴訟史
原相與安華高於2006.7.13.簽訂US6433780、US5686720、US5786804等3件專利授權合約,授權產品包含Optical Finger Mouse與optical pseudo trackball。
為了確保從光學滑鼠技術衍生出的OFM新產品專利也沒有問題,原相於2010.2.8.向美國北加州聯邦地方法院提出訴訟,請求確認先前簽訂的專利授權合約。
安華高也在2010.4.7.在同一法院對原相提出反訴,主張原相違反前述專利授權合約。

系爭專利
本案的系爭專利為US6,433,780,原由Agilent所擁有,Agilent將半導體部門獨立成Avago時,專利權同時移轉至Avago。原相於2003.10.31.,即曾對Agilent此專利提出確認專利不侵害之訴。而本次爭端再起的因素,也在確認該授權合約是否包括optical Psuedo Trackball。

US6,433,780
Title : Seeing eye mouse for a computer system
Filing Date : 2001.1.2.
Issue Date : 2002.8.13.
Abstract :
An optical mouse images as an array of pixels the spatial features of generally any micro textured or micro detailed work surface below the mouse. The photo detector responses are digitized and stored as a frame into memory. Motion produces successive frames of translated patterns of pixel information, which are compared by autocorrelation to ascertain the direction and amount of movement. A hold feature suspends the production of movement signals to the computer, allowing the mouse to be physically relocated on the work surface without disturbing the position on the screen of the pointer. This may be needed if the operator runs out of room to physically move the mouse further, but the screen pointer still needs to go further. The hold feature may be implemented with an actual button, a separate proximity detector or by detecting the presence of a characteristic condition in the digitized data, such as loss of correlation or velocity in excess of a selected limit. A convenient place for an actual hold button is along the sides of the mouse near the bottom, where the thumb and the opposing ring finger grip the mouse. The gripping force used to lift the mouse engages the hold function. Hold may incorporate a brief delay upon either the release of the hold button, detection of proper proximity or the return of reasonable digitized values. During that delay any illumination control or AGC servo loops stabilize. A new reference frame is taken prior to the resumption of motion detection.

2011年12月22日 星期四

Everlight vs. Nichia

億光(Everlight)與日亞化(Nichia)間纏訟多年的專利權訴訟案,終於畫下休止符。

訴訟史
2005.4.25.日亞化控告億光侵犯了其中華民國第089,036號新式樣專利,爭議產品主要為應用在手機等行動設備上,做為液晶螢幕背光源的LED產品。
2009.7.29.板橋地院一審判決:億光LED產品侵犯日亞化的專利,且億光需付出NT,000萬元的損害賠償,億光不服繼續上訴。
2010.7.22.智慧財產法院更一審判決億光勝訴,億光將不用賠給日亞化NT,000萬元的損害賠償。
2011.11.最高法院判決該專利民事侵權訴訟案,億光勝訴,全案定讞。
同時億光亦對系爭專利提出舉發案,2011.10.20.最高行政法院判決億光勝訴,經濟部智慧財產局將依判決,撤銷日亞化學此項專利權。
2011.12.1.億光向東京地方法院提起訴訟,訴請日亞化停止散布關於億光之不實侵權指控,並請求停止此一不公平競爭行為,並要求損害賠償等。

2011年12月21日 星期三

南亞科與IV簽訂智財合作協議

因Elpida對南亞科的DRAM侵權訴訟,提前促成Intellectual Ventures與南亞科於2011.12.1.簽訂「專利防禦」專案(IP-For-Defense program),成為IV全球第13家客戶。

Intellectual Ventures
IV成立於2000年,目前手上有3.5萬件專利,含蓋半導體、顯示器、材料、軟件、電視等領域,其中半導體相關的專利約佔20%,而DRAM相關專利又佔半導體專利數量20%,在NAND Flash領域的專利數,約佔半導體專利25%。
成立以來已取得近US億元的授權金收入,目前客戶包括:Samsung Electronics、Micron、American Express、LG Electronics、Bluecat Networks、Dashwire、SAP、Pantech、HTC、華映、緯創、南亞科等。

Smart的看法
IV是另一種NPE的經營模式,它收購別人的專利,專做專利授權,透過其強大的專利組合,協勵客戶進行防禦性的專利訴訟,但是,如果有一天,訴訟的二造都是它的客戶,不知道它該怎麼辦?

2011年12月20日 星期二

DigiTude出手囉

昨天提到有關Apple與DigiTude間的八卦,今天來看看DigiTude出手後,有那些公司遭殃。
DigiTude Innovations, LLC於2011.12.2.在ITC及Delaware地方法院分別提出侵害專利的告訴,系爭專利分別為:US5926636、US5929655、US6208879、US6456841,主要涉及4G技術使用於可攜式通訊裝置,被告群有:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA), Inc.
Research In Motion LTD., Research In Motion Corp.
Nokia Corporation, Nokia, Inc.
Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA, Inc.
Amazon.com Inc.
HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc.
這麼多的手機廠商,您也許會發現:怎麼沒有Apple?原來其中的US6208879號專利,曾經授權給Apple,但原因只是這麼單純嗎?這二家公司的關係是不是這麼的單純?值得我們後續觀察!

US5926636
Title : Remote procedural call component management method for a heterogeneous computer network
Filing Date : 1996.2.21.
Issue Date : 1999.7.20.
Assignee : Adaptec, Inc.
Abstract :
In response to a component management function call by a remote client application, the component management application programming interface (API) generates a message that identifies the called function and the version of the component management API. The component management API calls a local message transfer RPC command to send the message to a RPC command module. The RPC command module processes the local message transfer RPC command, and packages the message for transfer as a RPC over the heterogenous network. The RPC command module sends the packaged RPC to a network stack which in turn transmits the packaged RPC over the heterogenous network to a network stack in the server computer. The server network stack provides the packaged RPC to a server RPC command module that unpacks the RPC in a conventional manner to obtain the original message. The message is passed to a server component management API. The server component management API parses the message to determine the computer architecture of the client computer. With this information, server component management API reads the version specified in the message. If the specified version is incompatible with the version of the server component management API, a reply indicating the version incompatibility is transmitted to remote client application and otherwise the message is processed further by the server component management API.

US5929655
Title : Dual-purpose I/O circuit in a combined LINK/PHY integrated circuit
Filing Date : 1997.3.25.
Issue Date : 1999.7.27.
Assignee : Adaptec, Inc.
Abstract :
A dual-purpose I/O circuit for use in an integrated circuit having a primary circuit is provided. The dual-purpose I/O circuit includes two conducting pads, two single-ended I/O cells and one differential I/O cell. Several dual-purpose I/O circuits can be used within a single integrated circuit to support both single-ended and/or differential mode I/O signaling between external circuits and devices and a primary circuit within the integrated circuit. Within each dual-purpose I/O circuit, a first single-ended I/O cells is connected to a first conducting pad, a second single-ended I/O cell is connected to the second conducting pad and a differential I/O cell is connected to the both the first single-ended and second single-ended I/O cells and to both the first and second conducting pads. A control logic is connected to at least one of the first single-ended, second single-ended and differential I/O cells. The control logic is arranged to selectively enable and disable at least one of the first single-ended, second single-ended and differential I/O cells. The primary circuit can include any digital and/or analog circuit. The primary circuit can include a combined LINK/PHY circuit configured to support IEEE-1394 standard buses and communications.

US6208879
Title : Mobile information terminal equipment and portable electronic apparatus
Filing Date : 1999.3.8.
Issue Date : 2001.3.27.
Assignee : Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
Abstract :
The objective of the present invention is to have a desired screen displayed with shortened waiting time in using functions for the electronic note, etc., while engaging in telephone talk. Another prime objective of the present invention is to achieve an easy-to-use mobile information terminal equipment which also functions as an electronic note, word processor, personal computer, and so on. In transitting from telephone mode (cover closed status) to information terminal mode (cover opened status), the screen to be displayed is determined to be either a historical information, talk log information, or user setting screen. This enables the user to obtain the desired screen with fewer number of operations and with less waiting time.

US6456841
Title : Mobile communication apparatus notifying user of reproduction waiting information effectively
Filing Date : 1999.6.1.
Issue Date : 2002.9.24.
Assignee : Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
Abstract :
A mobile communication apparatus capable of notifying a user of the presence of reproduction waiting information like a short message with proving the user with an impact. A controller of the mobile communication apparatus decides, when a flip is opened, whether the reproduction waiting information is stored in a RAM. If it is stored, the controller displays on a screen a window image including an icon associated with the reproduction waiting information. If there are more than one pieces of the reproduction waiting information, multiple icons are displayed in the window image. One of the icons is selected by placing the cursor on it, so that the reproduction waiting information associated with the icon is replayed in response to the operation of a memory key by the user.

2011年12月19日 星期一

一篇可能是真的也可能是八卦的文章

大家可能會對今天的標題感到奇怪,什麼時候我們也在談八卦?原文出自:http://techcrunch.com/2011/12/09/apple-made-a-deal-with-the-devil-no-worse-a-patent-troll/。
Apple在面臨專利訴訟中,可謂是傷人七分自傷三分,為保全自己,透過一個patent troll做為白手套,亦不無可能,如果真的是這樣,未來的被告,就要面臨了更嚴峻的挑戰了。以下內容請參考:
Over the last two years, Apple has been engaged in vicious legal battles over smartphone patents, many of which are aimed at squelching (or squeezing money out of) manufacturers of devices running Android. And now, for some reason, it has given valuable patents to a patent troll — which is using them to sue many of the top technology companies in the world.
Meet Digitude Innovations, a firm based in Virginia that recently filed suit with the International Trade Commission alleging patent infringement by technology companies including RIM, HTC, LG, Motorola, Samsung, Sony, Amazon, and Nokia (note that Apple is not on this list). The ITC is a favorite for companies litigating over mobile phone patent disputes, as it can block the import of products long before a case has actually concluded.
Digitude was founded in 2010 and raised million from Altitude Capital Partners, with aims to “acquire, aggregate, and license key technology areas within the consumer electronics and related technology fields in a patent consortium” — in other words, it buys up patents and then sues other companies until they settle and agree to pay licensing fees, because it’s generally less expensive than actually going to court.

From a Forbes article this past June:
Digitude is a new kind of patent investment vehicle because it seeks to team up with strategic players that can invest in Digitude not with money, but by contributing patents. The contributing entity would then get a license for all of Digitude’s patents, [Digitude Chairman Robert] Kramer says.
In April, Digitude announced the “completion of its first such strategic partnership with one of the world’s leading consumer electronics companies” — which it didn’t name. The company later announced that additional (unnamed) parties have jumped on board as well, who will receive a portion of Digitude’s proceeds based on the value of the IP each party contributed.
Apple appears to be one of these participants, and may be the unnamed leading consumer electronics company that Digitude boasted about this past spring. Of the four patents that Digitude included in its claim this week, two were owned by Apple earlier this year, before they were transferred to Digitude.

The patents in question:
USPTO #6208879 — Mobile Information Terminal Equipment and Portable Electronic Apparatus
USPTO #6456841 — Mobile Communication Apparatus Notifying User Of Reproduction Waiting Information Effectively

In both cases, Apple transferred ownership of the patent to a company called Cliff Island LLC, which in turn transferred it to Digitude Innovations. In fact, Apple has transferred a dozen patents to Cliff Island LLC this year (though only two of these were named in this ITC suit).
You probably haven’t heard of Cliff Island LLC, because it appears to exist in name only. There is a next to no information about the company available online — though the patent filing does include an address: 485 Madison Avenue, Suite 2300 in New York City.
I was unable to find a phone number for the company, so I attempted to pay a visit to their office, only to find that it doesn’t appear to exist. But there are other tenants on the twenty-third floor of 485 Madison. One of which is Altitude Capital, the same IP-focused private equity firm that happened to lead Digitude’s million funding round.
Put another way, Apple appears to have transferred its patents to the patent troll Digitude, though it first routed them through a shell company that shares the same office as Digitude’s lead investor and Chairman. Further evidence of the relationship between Apple and Digitude can be found on the ITC’s own website, where a list of files relevant to the lawsuit can be found. Many of these files are marked confidential, but it appears someone mistakenly left the file names intact. One of which is “Digitude-Apple License Agreement” (see screenshot below).

So what is going on? There are a pair of scenarios that seem plausible — though both of them are strange.

The first is that Apple is using Digitude as a hired gun of sorts in its patent offensive, giving the company valuable patents to wield against its opponents (while avoiding the waves of press that are spurred by each new lawsuit). But Apple hasn’t exactly been quiet about suing its rivals over smartphone patents, so it’s not clear what they’d gain from this.
The alternative is that Apple has given some of its patents to Digitude because the patent troll came after it first. The dozen patents Apple has handed over may have been part of a settlement with the firm, along with the license agreement (which would presumably give Apple the rights to its patents, and additional Digitude patents). This seems more likely.
But even if Digitude shot first, so to speak, it’s still hard to see Apple in a positive light here. This is Apple we’re talking about. The idea that the company didn’t have any options other than handing over valuable patents to a patent troll — knowing full well that it would then use those patents to sue other tech companies — seems ludicrous.
I spoke with Julie Samuels, Staff Attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who focuses on patents, who points out that in some cases certain companies will sell their patents to other parties when they’re under financial stress. But Apple clearly doesn’t fall into that bucket.
If Apple were deliberately aiding Digitude, Samuels says “it would be horrifying — the patent troll problem is completely out of control. Apple has every legal right to sue over its patents, but it should be the one to do it”.
And if Apple was indeed threatened first by Digitude, and only handed over its patents as part of a settlement, she says she “cannot imagine any reasonable scenario where Apple didn’t have any other options”.
Both Apple and Digitude declined to comment.
Also, oddly, Digitude Innovations had a website as recently as December 4, but it apparently took it down in the last few days.

2011年12月16日 星期五

FlashPoint vs. HTC

FlashPoint於2010.5.14.向ITC請求調查HTC、RIM、LG、Nokia等公司,侵害其US6,163,816、US6,262,769專利,這些專利主要的技術包括:數位像機、手機等包含有拍照功能的電子顯像技術。

FlashPoint
FlashPoint是由Apple的團隊於1996年成立,以專利授權為主要收入來源。開發先進網路及數位內容的技術和解決方案,目前擁有超過80件美國專利。

ITC初判
ITC於2011.7.28.發出公告 (Notice) ,做出初步決定 (Final Initial and Recommended Determination):
1.FlashPoint 未能提出明確證據,證明\'769 和\'816 專利受到侵害
2.已經確定\'816 專利無效
3.提出的\'769 和 \'816 專利無效鑑於先前技術,是不成立的
4.FlashPoint的\'816 和 \'769 專利沒有專利耗盡疑慮
5.FlashPoint的\'769 或\'816 專利尚未建立國內產業
因此,認定被告宏達電未侵犯 FlashPoint 的電子影像專利。

ITC終判
ITC於2011.11.29.做出最終判決:
1.HTC生產智慧型手機Android及WP7皆未侵犯\'769專利權
2.HTC已建立一個隱含的\'769專利授權許可實施WP7智慧型手機,HTC的WP7智慧型手機存在\'769專利防禦性專利權耗盡
3.ITC委員會還決定採取行政法官發現,認定Flashpoint的\'769專利尚未建立國內產業規模
因此,ITC同意行政法官判決裁定HTC不侵權,並停止337調查。

US6,163,816
Title : System and method for retrieving capability parameters in an electronic imaging device
Filing Date : 1997.8.29.
Issue Date : 2000.12.19.
Abstract:
The present invention includes a system and method for obtaining a set of capability parameters for an electronic imaging device. The invention includes a series of capability parameter storage locations for containing capability parameter value sets, a GetCameraCapabilities command for retrieving these capability parameter value sets, and a parameter manager device for executing the GetCameraCapabilities command to retrieve the capability parameter value sets.

US6,262,769
Title : Method and system for auto rotating a graphical user interface for managing portrait and landscape images in an image capture unit
Filing Date : 1997.7.31.
Issue Date :2001.7.17.
Abstract:
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for automatically rotating a graphical user interface for managing portrait and landscape captures in an image capture unit. A method and apparatus for viewing an image in an image capture unit including a display comprises the steps of providing a first orientation associated with the image and providing a second orientation associated with the image capture unit. It is then determined whether the first orientation is different from the second orientation, and the image is displayed in the second orientation if the first and second orientations are different from each other.

2011年12月15日 星期四

美國駁回Samsung禁制令

Apple於2011.4.在美國加州San Jose地方法院控告Samsung的Galaxy系列智慧型手機與平板電腦嚴重剽竊iPhone與iPad專利,要求法院核發禁制令,但該項請求已於2011.12.2.被裁定駁回。

2011年12月14日 星期三

IP.COM vs. HTC

德國Mannheim法院在2009.2.判定HTC侵害IPCom的EP1186189號專利,並禁止銷售使用UMTS技術的HTC手機,每次違反禁制令將遭罰25萬歐元。
IPCom在2011.11.30.對HTC發出最後通牒,要求HTC在數天內停止在德國銷售各式3G智慧型手機,據說這是一款舊的智慧型手機。
德國地方法院在2009.12.18.以質疑專利有效性為由,暫停審理IPCom對HTC提出的侵權控訴,HTC亦於2011.11.25.因專利無效而撤回上訴。

2011年12月13日 星期二

Cinpres Gas Injection vs. BMW

2011.11.11.英國的氣體輔助射出成型產品製造商Cinpres Gas Injection在密西根州東部聯邦地院控告德國車廠BMW位於美國的北美子公司,侵害其3項專利,系爭產品則是BMW休旅車款X5的後照鏡以及Mini Cooper的後車箱裝置,系爭專利為:US5,458,846、US5,643,527及US6,716,387。

Cinpres Gas Injection
Cinpres Gas Injection成立於1983年,主要從事氣體輔助射出成型產品的研發和製造,氣體輔助射出成型本身是透過氮氣和熔融態塑料的結合,並透過高壓的方式射出成模具,該公司的專門技術為一種表面氣體成型的方法,主要可以應用在手機、小家電以及汽車用品等製造上。

US5,458,846
Title : Method of injection molding
Filing Date : 1994.6.15.
Issue Date : 1995.10.17.
Abstract :
An injection mold apparatus has a core and cavity halves. One or more gas poppet valves are affixed in the injection mold either in the movable and/or in the stationary halves of the mold. The poppet valves (or poppets) are located to open into a mold portion formed in the cavity between the movable portion of the injection mold and the fixed mold portion when the mold portions are closed. At least one gas line is connected to the poppets and to a gas pressure source and is adapted to open the poppets to the passage of nitrogen or other gas into the mold following the injection of molten plastic into the closed mold halves. Porous metal covers may be used to cover the opening in the mold either the movable and/or stationary halves of the injection mold in lieu of the gas poppet valves, and the gas pressure through the porous metal cover can be used to carry out the molding operation. An injection molding method is also taught using the injection of nitrogen gas into the mold immediately folowing the injection of the liquid plastic.

US5,643,527
Title : Method of injection molding
Filing Date : 1995.10.2.
Issue Date : 1997.7.1.
Abstract :
An injection mold apparatus has a core and cavity halves. One or more gas poppet valves are affixed in the injection mold either in the movable and/or in the stationary halves of the mold. The poppet valves (or poppets) are located to open into a mold portion formed in the cavity between the movable portion of the injection mold and the fixed mold portion when the mold portions are closed. At least one gas line is connected to the poppets and to a gas pressure source and is adapted to open the poppets to the passage of nitrogen or other gas into the mold following the injection of molten plastic into the closed mold halves. Porous metal covers may be used to cover the opening in the mold either the movable and/or stationary halves of the injection mold in lieu of the gas poppet valves, and the gas pressure through the porous metal cover can be used to carry out the molding operation. An injection molding method is also taught using the injection of nitrogen gas into the mold immediately following the injection of the liquid plastic.

US6,716,387
Title : Process for pressure assisted molding of hollow articles
Filing Date : 2002.2.28.
Issue Date : 2004.4.6.
Abstract :
The present invention provides a process for fluid assisted injection molding comprising the step of providing an injection molding apparatus having a mold body that defines a mold cavity. The process further comprises the steps of supplying a quantity of fluent plastic to the mold cavity, followed by injecting a fluid into the mold cavity. The fluid forms an expanding fluid pocket in the mold cavity, driving plastic to the furthest recesses of the mold and ensuring a smooth surface finish of the final molded product. A reservoir is selectively connectable to a plastic injection runner, and can be opened to the runner to receive molten plastic ejected by the introduction of the fluid to the mold cavity. When the reservoir is thusly connected, the pressure of the fluid forces the plastic through a supply passage, in a direction substantially opposite to its initial injection direction.

2011年12月12日 星期一

Samaung在澳洲的禁制令延緩1週出爐

Apple與Samsung的侵權訴訟,戰火遍及全球,2011.10.13.澳洲聯邦法院發出禁制令,禁止Samsung在澳洲推售Galaxy Tab 10.1平板電腦,直至Samsung與Apple解決雙方的專利權糾紛為止。但Samsung要求澳洲法院盡快取消對其最新款Galaxy平板電腦的禁制令。
2011.11.30出現了逆轉,澳洲法院收回這項禁令,Apple立刻向高等法院再提出上訴,澳洲高等法院於2011.12.2.宣布,把原本禁售令延長至2011.12.9.發布,在此之前,禁制令仍然有效,Samaung無法銷售其產品。

2011年12月9日 星期五

Apple的人臉辨識專利

Apple在推出智慧型手機的解鎖專利後,造成其他智慧型手機廠商的緊張,紛紛尋求解決方案,以避免侵權,如Samsung就想用人臉辨識的方法來解鎖,沒想到,Apple也推出一個3D辨識的專利,採用自動生物識別方法,分析2D圖形的曲線、點、輪廓,並將這些數據編譯成3D物體,之後就能識別或辨別包括臉部在內的任何三維物體物體。Samsung是否可迴避的掉?其他廠商又該怎麼辦?都值得持續觀察。

US8,064,685
Title : 3D object recognition
Filing Date : 2005.8.11.
Issue Date : 2011.11.22.
Abstract :
A method, device, system, and computer program for object recognition of a 3D object of a certain object class using a statistical shape model for recovering 3D shapes from a 2D representation of the 3D object and comparing the recovered 3D shape with known 3D to 2D representations of at least one object of the object class.

2011年12月8日 星期四

iPhone的防撞專利

為防止iPhone掉到地下使螢幕破裂,Apple研究了一個安全氣囊的專利,在玻璃與裝置組裝間隙填入特殊減震材質,當iPhone因掉落而產生衝擊時即可達到緩衝的效果。

US20110279961
Title : SHOCK MOUNTING COVER GLASS IN CONSUMER ELECTRONICS DEVICES
Filing Date : 2010.5.14.
Application Date : 2011.11.17.
Abstract :
Apparatus, systems and methods for shock mounting glass for an electronic device are disclosed. The glass for the electronic device can provide an outer surface for at least a portion of a housing for the electronic device. In one embodiment, the shock mounting can provide a compliant interface between the glass and the electronic device housing. In another embodiment, the shock mounting can provide a mechanically actuated retractable. For example, an outer glass member for an electronic device housing can be referred to as cover glass, which is often provided at a front surface of the electronic device housing.

2011年12月7日 星期三

S3 vs. Apple終判

S3控告Apple侵害其圖紋壓縮專利案,ITC於2011.11.22.的終判推翻了初判的結果,認為Apple並未侵害S3的專利。

Smart的看法
HTC為了對抗Apple的侵權訴訟,於2011.7.7.以US$3億元購買S3,就是期望以S3的專利能協助HTC打勝這場仗,雖然當時HTC的股價已經反映出不看好的蹟象。ITC的終判坐實了大家的疑慮,而終判也使HTC要重新檢討這項交易。
從未來的市場來看,HTC這次的失利,將處於不利的地位,Samsung還可以拿出通訊的專利來跟Apple抗衡,HTC要準備足夠的糧草長期抗戰,可能不太容易。
HTC、Google都沒有一個殺手級的專利,可以讓Apple敗陣,所以即使不斷的購買專利,仍然只能一路捱打。從這個案例中,可以讓我們了解:未來台廠在做品牌時,一定要有一些足以抗衡大廠的創意技術,或核心技術,才能在專利戰中全身而退。

2011年12月6日 星期二

Apple的省電技術

正當iPhone4S被使用用反映耗電之際,Apple早在2010年就已在研究如何讓OLED節電的技術。
根據USPTO公開的專利資料顯示,Apple在2010年所申請的這個專利,主要是針對OLED在發白光時的大量電力消耗做修正,其技術係採用中間一可開關的半透明切換層,外面是發光的OLED像素顆粒,而內側則是一層白色的背景。當面板要發出白色的光時,OLED像素顆粒就不發光,並且將切換層切換為透明狀態,這時侯白色的背景直接穿透,即顯示為白色的色彩,由於OLED係在不發光狀態,將可節省大量的耗能。

US20110267279
Title : POWER EFFICIENT ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY
Filing Date : 2010.4.29.
Application Date : 2011.11.3.
Abstract :
The present disclosure relates to the use of a solid background layer in conjunction with a transparent display panel. In one such implementation, a layer that is switchable between opaque and transparent states is provided between the solid background layer and the transparent display panel. By switching the switchable layer between opaque and transparent states, visibility of the background layer through the transparent display panel may be controlled.

2011年12月5日 星期一

立法院三讀通過專利法修正案

立法院於2011.11.29.上午三讀通過「專利法」修正草案,其施行日期將由行政院另定之,新法預計在公布後1年施行。

本次修正重點如下:
1.增訂因申請人己意在刊物發表者亦可主張優惠期。
2.增訂非因故意未於申請時主張優先權,或未按時繳納專利證書費或年費致失權者,准其申請回復權利之機制。
3.將申請專利範圍及摘要獨立於說明書之外。
4.刪除申請人主動申請修正之時間限制,及放寬發明專利申請案得於初審核准審定後30日內申請分割。
5.增修專利權效力不及之事項,如非出於商業目的之未公開行為、以取得國內外藥物上市許\可為目的之研究試驗行為、明確採行國際耗盡原則等。
6.修正醫藥品或農藥品之專利權期間延長規定。
7.修正強制授權事由、程序及同時核定補償金之規定。
8.增訂為協助解決開發中國家及低度開發國家之公共衛生問題,得申請強制授權製造藥品並出口至需求國。
9.修正專利舉發制度,如廢除依職權審查、得就部分請求項提起舉發、舉發案及更正案之合併審查及合併審定等。
10.明定專利侵權損害賠償之主觀要件、修正損害賠償之計算方式及專利標示規定。
11.增訂同人同日分別申請發明專利及新型專利之規定,當智慧局認為可准予發明專利時,將通知申請人擇一,申請人選擇發明專利時,新型專利權視為自始不存在。
12.開放部分設計、電腦圖像及圖形化使用者介面(Icons & GUI)設計、成組物品設計,並增訂衍生設計制度。

詳細資料請見:http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/News_NewsContent.aspx?NewsID=5571

2011年12月2日 星期五

智慧電表的專利訴訟

智慧電網(Smart Grid)是本世紀各國紛紛投入的產業,而智慧電表(Smart Meter)又是智慧電網的關鍵產品,既然是關鍵產品,當然難逃專利的追殺。
2011.11.1.美國德州的TransData在威斯康辛州西部聯邦地院,控告美國威斯康辛州的電力及照明公司Wisconsin Power & Light Company 涉嫌在電表的設計上侵犯該公司的3項專利技術。
TransData成立於1969年,主要從事光電等能源使用的計量裝置研發,在電表的產品已發展至第6代,供應給全球超過30個國家以及全美前50大電力公司使用。
自2010.10.以來,TransData 已提起了9項訴訟,大多集中在2011年,至11月已連續控告了美國本土7個地方的電力公司。
本案的系爭專利有:US6,181,294 、 US6,462,713及US6,903,699。

US6,181,294
Title : Antenna for electric meter and method of manufacture thereof
Filing Date : 1998.3.17.
Issue Date : 2001.1.30.
Abstract :
For use with an electric meter chassis having a dielectric housing protruding therefrom, an antenna for allowing electric meter circuitry within the chassis to communicate wirelessly through the dielectric housing and a method of manufacturing the same. In one embodiment, the antenna includes: (1) antenna elements, located within the dielectric housing and adapted to transmit and receive electromagnetic radiation and (2) a balance circuit, coupled to the antenna elements to cause the antenna elements to act as an antenna and couplable to an unbalanced output port of a wireless communication circuit, that balances an impedance of the unbalanced output port thereby to balance the antenna.

US6,462,713
Title : Antenna for electric meter and method of manufacturing thereof
Filing Date : 2001.1.25.
Issue Date : 2002.8.8.
Abstract :
For use with an electric meter chassis having a dielectric housing protruding therefrom, an antenna for allowing electric meter circuitry within the chassis to communicate wirelessly through the dielectric housing and a method of manufacturing the same. In one embodiment, the antenna includes: (1) antenna elements, located within the dielectric housing and adapted to transmit and receive electromagnetic radiation and (2) a balance circuit, coupled to the antenna elements to cause the antenna elements to act as an antenna and couplable to an unbalanced output port of a wireless communication circuit, that balances an impedance of the unbalanced output port thereby to balance the antenna.

US6,903,699
Title : Wireless communication device for electric meter and method of manufacture thereof
Filing Date : 2002.10.7.
Issue Date : 2005.6.7.
Abstract :
For use with an electric meter chassis having a dielectric housing protruding therefrom, a wireless communication device that permits information to be communicated to and from the electric meter and a method of manufacturing the same. In one embodiment, the device is comprised of: (1) a communication circuit within the chassis coupled to electric meter circuitry, and (2) an antenna element within the dielectric housing, the antenna element coupled to the communication circuit.

2011年12月1日 星期四

Elpida vs. Nanya

Elpida自2011.9.6.起即陸續對Nanya發動專利戰,分別向加州北部地方法院、ITC及台灣智慧財產權法院控告台灣Nanya Technology,侵犯動態隨機存取記憶體(DRAM)專利權。

系爭專利
2011.9.6. California Northern District Court
US6894363
US7060588
US7709366
US5838036
2011.11.15. ITC
US6150689
US6635918
US6555861
US7659571
US7713828
US7495453
US7906809
2011.11.16. 台灣智慧財產法院
TWI324386
TW165468
TW169733
TWI298540

Elpida
Elpida是日本記憶體公司也是全球第3大DRAM廠,係由Hitachi和NEC的記憶體部門於1999年合併而成,2003年又併購Mitsubishi的記憶體製造部門,2004年在日本東京證券交易所掛牌上市。目前握有瑞晶64%股權,力晶36%的股權。

Smart的看法
從市場面看,受泰國水患影響,PC產值減少,致使DRAM的市場供過於求、價格下滑,各大廠無不減產因應,全球DRAM每月減產約23萬至25萬片,約為全部DRAM廠產能的50%。其中Samsung已減產70%,台灣廠商南科、華亞科則減產50%,力晶則降低產能80%,而Elpida也已減產25%,在這個時候採取專利訴訟,到底是為什麼呢?
根據科資中心的調查顯示:南亞科主要技術來源自美國IBM及Micron,而南亞科分別與它們簽訂的專利授權合約也將到期。
從科資中心的調查看來,Elpida選在南亞科的授權合約到期前,發動專利戰的目的是什麼?就值的玩味了,是希望南亞科在合約到期後,改跟Elpida簽授權合約?還是另有目的?後續發展需要持續追踪!